Lancaster County
Board of Commissioners
Board of Commissioners
STAFF MEETING AGENDA Lancaster County Board Of Commissioners Tuesday, September 15, 1998 - 9:00 a.m. County-City Building - Room #113 AGENDA ITEM 1 9:00am REVIEW FINAL REPORT, PHASE II - OPERATIONAL & ARCHITECTURAL PROGRAM, COMPREHENSIVE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM STUDY - Dennis Banks, Attention Center Director; Jim Hille, Sinclair Hille; Dave Kroeker, Budget & Fiscal Officer
MINUTES Lancaster County Board Of Commissioners County-City Building Meeting Room #113 Tuesday, September 15, 1998 9 a.m. Commissioners Present: Linda Steinman, Chair Kathy Campbell Bernie Heier Larry Hudkins Commissioners Absent: Steve Svoboda Others Present: Kerry Eagan, Chief Administrative Officer Dave Kroeker, Budget & Fiscal Officer Kit Boesch, Human Services Administrator Diane Staab, Deputy County Attorney Ann Taylor, County Clerk's Office AGENDA ITEM 1 REVIEW FINAL REPORT, PHASE II - OPERATIONAL & ARCHITECTURAL PROGRAM, COMPREHENSIVE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM STUDY - Dennis Banks, Attention Center Director; Jim Hille, Sinclair Hille & Associates Inc. Dennis Banks, Attention Center Director, noted that the Lancaster County Comprehensive Juvenile Justice System Study recommended construction of a 60 bed secure detention/20 bed staff secure juvenile facility and Assessment Center. He suggested expanding those plans to include a day reporting program, thereby providing a more comprehensive, integrated juvenile system. Steinman noted that day reporting program options already exist within the community. Banks briefly reviewed cost implications and management and efficiency problems associated with locating the staff secure facility separate from the secure detention facility. Campbell questioned whether sufficient funds had been budgeted for construction of a staff-secure facility or whether a staff-secure facility and alternative programs could be located in the existing Attention Center facility. She noted that site selection will impact the array of core services administered by the County, as programs such as an Assessment Center and day reporting may need to be located in close proximity to schools and families. Kit Boesch, Human Services Administrator, suggested that the existing Attention Center facility could be used for an Assessment Center and alternative programs such as day and night reporting. Eagan suggested the County seek coordination with programs offered by the Lincoln Public Schools to alternative students. Heier proposed development of a complete juvenile justice complex, which would include an arraignment court and on-site probation officers to better meet the needs of juveniles. Hille asked whether the Board envisioned the staff-secure facility operating as an extension of the classification system or as a separate and distinct population. Banks remarked that his ability to manage the populations would be enhanced if he had the authority to move youth from secure detention to staff-secure, based upon a classification system and an assessment tool. Boesch noted that Crime Commission financial assistance for construction and operating costs may be contingent upon location of the staff-secure facility separate from the secure detention facility. Hille reviewed the site diagram, noting that if one of the housing pods were eliminated, reducing the secure detention facility to 60 beds, there will be an insufficient number of beds available to provide program or behavioral grouping in addition to separation of youth based on gender, age grouping and severity of offense. Kroeker suggested that the County build the facility with 80 bed secure beds, rather than a division of 60 secure and 20 staff-secure beds, to reduce costs. He noted that the County could operate a staff-secure program within one of the 20 bed pods or could contract initially for operation of a staff-secure facility at a separate site, with the option to build staff-secure beds on-site at a later date. Hille noted that, although co-locating the two facilities on one site would allow sharing of some program and resource spaces, the two youth populations would need to be kept totally separate. Boesch suggested that more comparison was needed of the cost of operation of a staff-secure facility by the County versus that of a non-profit agency. Banks stated that secure detention and staff-secure philosophies are distinctly different and combining the two in one facility would make management difficult. In response to a question from Heier, Hille stated that the staff-secure housing could be built with infrastructure in place to allow conversion to secure detention to meet changing populations needs. Brief discussion took place with regards to location of an Assessment Center and transportation and accessibility issues. Boesch noted concern that location of the Assessment Center in the Attention Center facility could make placement in the detention facility more accessible. She suggested that locating the Assessment Center elsewhere in the community could broaden the array of assessments to include mentally ill and intoxicated juveniles. Boesch also reported that Region V has targeted grant funds for development of an Assessment Center. She stated that juvenile offender assessments could be included in that program. Steinman suggested that the Assessment Center could initially consist of one or more Probation Officers making determination of placement, rather than an actual building. She also suggested that a Probation Officer could be available at both the Attention Center facility and at a separate site to make assessments. Hille noted that Juvenile Court Judges would be able to remain in electronic contact with the Assessment Center, thereby maintaining their authority with regards to placement decisions. Hille suggested that a Probation Officer, assigned by the Juvenile Court to make juvenile assessments, could also make decisions regarding transition between the staff-secure and secure detention facilities. On-site location of the Assessment Center would make it possible for that Probation Officer to have direct contact with those juveniles. Campbell suggested that additional input was needed from the Assessment Center Review Committee. MOTION: Campbell moved and Hudkins seconded to authorize Jim Hille, Architect, and Dennis Banks, Attention Center Director, to proceed with development of plans for a 60 bed juvenile secure detention facility and staff-secure facility, to be located on the same site, with the potential for expansion of 20 additional secure detention beds. Heier and Hudkins requested that determination of placement of the Assessment Center be determined at a later date. ON CALL: Campbell, Hudkins, Heier and Steinman voted aye. Motion carried. The Board indicated that if the proposed Constitutional Amendment passes, further review of the Attention Center project will be necessary. The Board requested that Kroeker contact Don Killeen, County Property Manager, regarding the part-time allotment of hours for Greg Pettibone, City/County Property Management, to serve as Project Manager. Hille also provided a brief update on the progress of site selection, noting the potential for sharing of infrastructure costs with the State of Nebraska for the Yankee Hill site. The Board also approved setting of a date for a Tri-County Meeting with representatives of the Sarpy and Douglas County Boards for November 12th or 19th. By direction of the Chair, the meeting was adjourned. ______________________ Kandra Hahn Lancaster County Clerk